New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing during the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal for the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of at some point from the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of the alleged event as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in any way into the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is a weak type of evidence which might be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other over a motorcycle at four.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
“Ensuring the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple reputable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Reasonable grounds can be found over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of your alleged offence. However punishment of the alleged offence does not slide within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls while in the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, advice has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of your same is hereby reproduced:
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment about the offender, making certain They may be held accountable for their actions.
The issue Here's that an accused may well say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
While a lot of websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical to evaluate the credibility of your source before counting on the information.
Alternative Punishment: In a few cases, the court could have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative towards the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life behind bars without the possibility of parole or early website release.
She did note that the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was acquiring counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.
Section 489-F on the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective will be to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of the national currency.
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not offered her plenty of notice before raising her rent, citing a different state legislation that requires a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.